We're going to talk about another type of communication, organisational communication......
It is a system of a large number of people working together to achieve multiple goals. We can find it around us, maybe some of you are part of it....
People inside an organisation will become interdependent with each other. Usually, there is a hierarchical structure (different level within) in it.
For example:

People who work in an organisation may need to put aside individuals' goals, they need to prioritize organisational goals. They should know what to say and what not to say, they need to consider other people too.
Usually, information within an organisation is enclosed to outsiders. An organisation should know how to create, analyse, store, and retrieve information properly in order to protect it.
Organisation Structure has 2 types, formal and informal............
Information flow inside a formal organisation has 3 types:
1) Downward flow...... (e.g. from boss to staff)
2) Upward flow..... (e.g. from staff to boss)
3) Horizontal flow..... (e.g. from staff to staff)

In downward flow, the information may not be received by the staff as expected, information may be inadequate and incomplete. This condition may becomes worse if serial transmission occurs, it occurs when information is distributed from one person to another and so on. Details may be missed out, only important points are received.
In upward flow, the boss may neglect negative feedbacks or messages from the staff. Sometimes, the staff does not want to talk about problem with the boss, so he/she keeps it. If the boss has a secretary, the secretary may be a gatekeeper. She will separate the information, she decides which one is important and which one is not. She will only give important information to the boss.

Now, let's move on to informal organisation.............
This is more about personal relationship with other members of the organisation. Information such as gossip and rumour may be shared, usually the accuracy is quite high inside an organisation.
Relationship with other members may be differentiate by degree of connectedness.
There are 7 types of network roles:
1) Cosmopolite, a member who has connection with people outside the organisation.
2) Bridge, a member of a clique and has a connection with another clique.
3) Clique, a group of similar interests
4) Isolate, a member which does not belong to any cliques
5) Liaison, a member who connects 2 cliques but not a member of either clique
6) Opinion Leader, an influential member of a clique
7) Star, a member who has a lot of connections with other members (a favourite member)
All of these types can be found near us, maybe we are one of them. We can apply these types to our relationship with friends and relatives.
Which one is your role? (please give your answer/feedback in the comment's box.... Thanks)
*FYI, this is my last entry, thank you for your contribution...................*
Have a nice day....... :D
Bye2.........
hehe
ReplyDeleteI really dunno what role i play here.
Bridge perhaps?
Cos these things require a third party to tell you what role you are doing subconsciously...
(Do comment on my post! :D )
Hmm i guess that the roles we play as a person at a different place are differernt... examlpe one may be a decision make in group 1 but just a follower in group 2 ^^ haha
ReplyDeletewow... how complicated it is..
ReplyDeleteim actually dont really understand..
however, this blog is 'must read'
:D:D
I think all of us have more than one roles. Like you may a clique in a group and a brigde in another group too. Haha..
ReplyDeleteLike yvonne said, our roles maybe different at different roles, so many of the roles, I think are interlinked. =)
Joanne
I think a good organization would be one that is able to keep both the upward flow and downward flow at a positive balance. Only through this can organizational members be reasonably satisfied with the company structure.
ReplyDeleteWith regards to the question, all the various roles seem difficult for me to assume! If I had to work towards one, I would like to say 'opinion leader' :)